SAN DIEGO – April 30, 2018 – Mandatory public reporting of coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) results in Massachusetts was associated with better patient outcomes compared to national findings, according to a recent study.
“State-mandated public reporting of CABG results has been conducted among the 14 Massachusetts cardiac surgery programs since 2002,” explains David M. Shahian, MD, Professor of Surgery, Harvard Medical School, and Vice-President, Center for Quality and Safety, Massachusetts General Hospital, who led the investigation. “In the current study, we analyzed trends in observed and expected mortality rates and risk factor prevalences, as well as evidence for risk aversion and adverse consequences of outlier designation.”
Investigators compared observed and expected outcomes and risk factor prevalences in Massachusetts with contemporaneous national data from the Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) National Database. They also studied the potential association of outlier status with subsequent decreases in market share and expected mortality, the latter a possible indicator of risk aversion. The authors analyzed three populations of adults 18 years or older undergoing isolated CABG surgery between 2003 and 2014: isolated CABG cases in all non-federal Massachusetts hospitals submitted to the Massachusetts Data Analysis Center, or Mass-DAC, which administered the public reporting program (Mass-DAC cohort); isolated CABG procedures submitted to STS from all US states other than Massachusetts (STS national cohort); and isolated CABG cases submitted directly to STS from Massachusetts hospitals (MA [STS] cohort).
CABG volume decreases from 2002 to 2014 were less in Massachusetts than in STS national data or in New York, another state with mandatory public reporting. Mass-DAC procedure and vital status data were complete and highly accurate. Many risk factor prevalences were similar to those of STS national data, although several uncommon but high-risk characteristics including preoperative cardiogenic shock, emergency status, or heart attack within 24 hours preceding surgery were significantly less common in Massachusetts. Some but not all those differences resulted from a novel peer-adjudication process in Massachusetts. This provided additional scrutiny of cases submitted by hospitals with these codes, some of which were changed, especially in the early years of the public reporting program.
Cardiac surgery public reporting was associated with excellent mortality outcomes. Using identical STS risk models, Massachusetts expected mortality rates were higher than STS national rates in the early years of the Massachusetts public reporting program, then subsequently tracked STS expected rates closely. Massachusetts annual observed and risk-adjusted mortality rates were consistently lower than STS national rates, as were the ratios of observed to expected mortality (O/E). For two programs that received an outlier designation during the study period, the impacts on subsequent expected mortality rates and market shares were variable and transient.
Possible explanations for better performance in Massachusetts, which the data cannot differentiate, include the salutary effects of public reporting, as described in New York, another public reporting state. However, there are also other potential explanations, including Massachusetts Determination of Need regulations that result in fewer but higher volume programs, and the fact that most Massachusetts cardiac surgery programs are in major tertiary centers or their affiliates. Both procedural volume and teaching intensity have previously been shown to be associated with better healthcare outcomes. The last and most controversial potential explanation is risk aversion, the avoidance of high-risk cases because of their feared impact on report card scores, reputations, and referrals. The evidence for this practice in the study by Shahian and colleagues was mixed, with lower prevalences of several high-risk characteristics, but overall expected mortality rates in Massachusetts that were higher than, or no different than, STS national rates, and risk-adjusted rates and O/E ratios that were consistently better.
“The bottom line is that mandatory public reporting was consistently associated with better outcomes, although a causal relationship cannot be proven, and there was conflicting and inconclusive evidence for risk aversion”, comments Dr. Shahian.
For more information or to reach the authors for comment, contact Lisa McEvoy, Director of Marketing and Communications for AATS, at +1 617-312-1740 or email@example.com.
The American Association for Thoracic Surgery (AATS) is an international organization that encourages, promotes, and stimulates the scientific investigation of cardiothoracic surgery. Founded in 1917 by a respected group of the earliest pioneers in the field, its original mission was to “foster the evolution of an interest in surgery of the Thorax.” Today, the AATS is the premiere association for cardiothoracic surgeons in the world and works to continually enhance the ability of cardiothoracic surgeons to provide the highest quality of patient care. Its more than 1500 members have a proven record of distinction within the specialty and have made significant contributions to the care and treatment of cardiothoracic disease.