AATS: American Association for Thoracic Surgery.
Watch the AATS Leadership Video
 
Temporary acute mechanical circulatory support for acute circulatory collapse: experience with 266 patients
Kristopher B. Deatrick, Amit K. Mathur, Ann Schumar, Robert H. Bartlett, Francis D. Pagani, Jonathan W. Haft; Cardiac Surgery, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI

Objective: Temporary mechanical circulatory support can be offered to patients in shock refractory to medical treatment. This report reviews our experience with several support systems with respect to early, midterm, and late outcome, and assesses predictors of mortality.
Methods: We systematically reviewed the records of patients 16 years of age and older who received temporary mechanical support due to acute circulatory collapse. Three modes of support were used: venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), ABIOMED ventricular assist device (VAD) systems, or the TandemHeart percutaneous VAD. Circulatory support was used for circulatory collapse due one of the following: acute myocardial infarction (AMI) n=61 (23%), post-cardiotomy failure n=34 (13%), pulmonary embolism (PE) n =13 (5%), cardiomyopathy (CM) n=77 (29%), sepsis n=22 (8%), other acute heart failure n=28 (11%), or heart or lung transplant graft dysfunction (GD) n=17 (6%). Mortality was confirmed using the Social Security Death Index. Survival was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Risk-adjusted in-hospital mortality was determined using Cox proportional-hazards models.
Results: From 1997-2008, 278 patients at our center have received temporary circulatory support; 266 patients had sufficient data available for analysis. Mean age of patients was 47.5 +/- 14.1 years. 60% (n=159) of patients were male. Average duration on acutely placed support was 5.2 ±5.6 days. 57% (n=154) of patients were successfully weaned. Survival to discharge was 40% (n=113). Of patients who survived to discharge, median survival was 235 days. 26% of patients (n=68) received a long term VAD, and 18% (n=47) underwent heart transplantation. Device-specific survival is demonstrated in figure 1. The AMI indication was independently associated with increased in-hospital mortality (HR 2.56, 95% CI (1.01-6.50)). Male gender (HR 0.70 95% CI (0.48-0.99)), support greater than 5 days (HR 0.62 95%CI(0.43-0.88)), and receiving a long-term VAD (HR 0.55 95%CI(0.34-0.89)) were independently associated with lower mortality.
Conclusion: Reasonable survival can be expected for patients requiring temporary circulatory support with a variety of devices. Acute MI was an independent predictor of in-hospital mortality. Multi-center data is needed to better understand predictors of mortality following acute circulatory support.


Back to 2009 Annual Meeting
Back to Program Outline
Back to Main Program
We Model Excellence
Follow AATS on Facebook
Copyright © American Association for Thoracic Surgery. All rights reserved.
Read the Privacy Policy.
IMPORTANT REMINDER: The preceding information is intended only to provide
general guidance and not as a definitive basis for diagnosis or treatment in any particular case.
It is very important that you consult a doctor about any specific medical problem or question.