AATS: American Association for Thoracic Surgery.
Watch the AATS Leadership Video
 
Endobronchial Ultrasound-Guided Fine-Needle Aspiration of Mediastinal Lymph Nodes: The Thoracic Surgeon's Perspective
Rafael S. Andrade, Shawn S. Groth, Natasha M. Rueth, Jonathan D'Cunha, Michael A. Maddaus; Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN

Objective: To assess our results with endobronchial ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EBUS-FNA) of mediastinal lymph nodes (MLNs) and to describe the number and types of additional procedures we performed in the same anesthetic setting as EBUS-FNA.
Methods: We performed an Institutional Review Board-approved review of our prospectively maintained database of all patients who underwent EBUS-FNA of MLNs by thoracic surgeons at our institution from September 1, 2006 through September 30, 2008.
We included patients in our analysis if (1) EBUS-FNA cytology revealed malignancy or (2) non-malignant cytology (normal lymph node, benign pathology, or nondiagnostic samples) was verified with a confirmatory procedure (i.e., mediastinoscopy, thoracoscopy, or thoracotomy) that sampled the same MLN stations as sampled by EBUS-FNA. We excluded the 10 initial procedures required to overcome our learning curve. These criteria ensured the most accurate representation of our sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value (NPV), positive predictive value (PPV), and accuracy.
Results: Over the study period, 166 patients underwent EBUS, 155 with FNA. Of these, 77 met our inclusion criteria. We report a sensitivity of 91.1%, a specificity of 96.8%, a NPV of 88.2%, a PPV of 97.6%, and a diagnostic accuracy of 93.4%. We performed an additional procedure in 59% of patients in the same anesthetic setting as EBUS-FNA: 41% underwent a diagnostic procedure (mediastinoscopy [21%], endoscopic ultrasound-guided FNA [11%], thoracoscopy [9%], thoracotomy [0.2%]) and 35% underwent a therapeutic procedure (pulmonary resection [23%], tracheostomy [5%], intravenous port placement [5%], gastrostomy tube placement [4%], and pleurodesis [1%]).
Conclusion: Thoracic surgeons can perform EBUS-FNA with excellent results and have the distinct ability to combine EBUS-FNA with additional diagnostic and therapeutic procedures in a single anesthetic setting. EBUS-FNA adds to the thoracic surgeon’s unique capacity to expedite diagnostic work-up and treatment thereby streamlining patient care.
Back to 2009 Annual Meeting
Back to Program Outline
Back to Main Program
We Model Excellence
Follow AATS on Facebook
Copyright © American Association for Thoracic Surgery. All rights reserved.
Read the Privacy Policy.
IMPORTANT REMINDER: The preceding information is intended only to provide
general guidance and not as a definitive basis for diagnosis or treatment in any particular case.
It is very important that you consult a doctor about any specific medical problem or question.