AATS: American Association for Thoracic Surgery.
Watch the AATS Leadership Video
 
Surgical Ventricular Restoration for Anteroseptal Scars. Volume or Shape?
Antonio M. Calafiore1, Angela L. Iacò1, Davide Amata1, Cataldo Castello1, Egidio Varone1, Fabio Falconieri1, Antonio Bivona1, Sabina Gallina2, Michele Di Mauro3; 1Cardiac Surgery, University of Catania, Catania, Italy; 2University of Chieti - Department of Cardiology, Chieti, Italy; 3University of Catania - Villa Bianca Hospital, Catania - Bari, Italy

Objective: Surgical ventricular restoration (SVR) has, as a target, reduction of left ventricular (LV) volume. More recently maintaining a conical shape was considered as important as volume reduction. This retrospective analysis compared the results of these two strategies
Methods: From January 1988 to February 2008, 276 patients with anteroseptal scars underwent elective SVR. Before 2002 a Dor procedure was performed in 107 cases (favoring volume reduction, group A). From 2002, 169 patients underwent SVR to maintain a conical LV chamber (favoring shaping, group B); a Dor procedure (when the scar was septoapical) was used in 29 cases and septal reshaping (when the septum was more involved than the anterior wall) in 140. Preoperatively the 2 groups were similar but age (A 62±10 vs B 66±10 years, p=0.001), ejection fraction (EF) (A 38±10 vs B 33±8, p<0.001), mitral regurgitation grade (A 0.9±0.9 vs B 1.7±1.4, p<0.001) and mitral valve surgery (MVS) rate (A 22.4% vs B 46.2%, p<0.001). Late events included death any cause, NYHA Class III-IV and heart transplantation; cardiac events included cardiac death instead of death any cause.
Results: Early mortality was 7.6%, 11.2% (A) versus 5.3% (B) (p=0.072). Logistic regression, adjusted for age, EF, and MVS showed that the choice of volume reduction (A) more than shape (B) was significantly related to higher early mortality (OR=5.1, p=0.002). Four-year freedom from any death was 79.2±2.5 (A 75.7±4.1 vs B 81.6±3.2, p=0.232), from cardiac death was 83.9±2.3 (A 78.3±4.0 vs B 87.6±2.8, p=0.037), from cardiac events was 72.9±2.9 (A 65.8±4.6 vs B 78.3±3.7, p=0.023) and from any event was 68.8±3.0 (A 63.6±4.7 vs B 72.7±3.8, p=0.117). Cox analysis, adjusted for age, EF and MVS showed that volume reduction rather than LV reshaping provided lower survival (HR=2.1, p=0.011), cardiac survival (HR=3.0, p<0.001), cardiac event-free survival (HR=2.7, p<0.001) and event-free survival (HR=2.2, p<0.001).
Conclusion: Maintaining a conical ventricular shape provides better results when compared with pure volume reduction.
Back to 2009 Annual Meeting
Back to Program Outline
Back to Main Program
We Model Excellence
Follow AATS on Facebook
Copyright © American Association for Thoracic Surgery. All rights reserved.
Read the Privacy Policy.
IMPORTANT REMINDER: The preceding information is intended only to provide
general guidance and not as a definitive basis for diagnosis or treatment in any particular case.
It is very important that you consult a doctor about any specific medical problem or question.