AATS: American Association for Thoracic Surgery.
Watch the AATS Leadership Video
 
Scientific Affairs and Government Relations
  • NIH Notice: 2010 Salary Limitation on Grants more
  • New NIH Recovery Act Funding Opportunities more
  • NIH Program Announcements for NCI and NHLBI – Opening in January more
  • NCI Funding Opportunity: Prediction Models for Cancer Risk and Prognosis (R01/R21) more
  • NHLBI New Funding Opportunity (R34) to Support Clinical Trial Pilot Studies more
  • NIH: Shorter applications better aligned to the review criteria more
  • FDA Pediatric Clinical Trials Workshop, October 29-30, 2009 more
  • NHLBI Announces Structural Change more
  • NHLBI Funding Opportunity (R01) more
  • Dr. David H. Harpole named co-chair of the NCI Lung Cancer Steering Committee more
  • Dr. Marc Moon appointed to serve on the FDA's Circulatory System Devices Panel. more
  • NHLBI / NCI Stimulus-Funded Grant Proposals Due April 27 more
  • NCI -- Allowable Salary Levels on Career Awards more
  • NIH Notice: Salary Limitation on Grants more
  • AHRQ Mentored Clinical Scientist Research Career Development Award (K08) more
  • K23 Mentored Patient-Oriented Research Career Development Award more
  • K08 Mentored Clinical Scientist Research Career Development Award more
  • New NIH Registration Process to Reimburse Reviewers more
  • CSR Announces Updated Study Sections more
  • NIH Peer Review System Updates for FY 2010 Funding more
  • Dr. Andrew S. Wechsler appointed as Senior Advisor to the Division of Cardiovascular Diseases of the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute more 
  • NHLBI Seeks Leader for the Division of Cardiovascular Diseases (DCVD) more
  • A2 applications to be eliminated more
  • Encouraging Early Transition to Research Independence: Modifying the NIH New Investigator Policy to Identify Early Stage Investigators (NOT-OD-08-121) more
  • Elias A. Zerhouni to End Tenure as Director of the National Institutes of Health more
  • Enhancing NIH Peer Review Activity Implementation Timeline more
  • Stats reveal bias in NIH grant review more
  • NIH Extramural Loan Repayment Programs more
  • Stem Cells and Cancer (R21) Funding Opportunity more
  • NIH-Supported Midcareer Development Award Program. more
  • NHLBI (R01) Request for Applications: Developmental Origins of Altered Lung Physiology and Immune Function more
  • Revision of NIH Policy Concerning Concurrent Support from Mentored Career Development (K) Award and a Research Grant more
  • NHLBI Does Not Accept R21 Applications Primarily Related to Cancer Research more
  • NIH Gives Reviewers New Flexibility Submitting Applications more
  • NIH Notice: Salary Limitation on Grants more
  • AATS Progress in Achieving Goals for Peer Review of Cardiothoracic Surgical Grant Proposals to NIH more
 

NIH Notice: 2010 Salary Limitation on Grants

The Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2010, Public Law 111-117, restricts the amount of direct salary of an individual under an NIH grant to Executive Level I of the Federal Executive Pay scale. The Executive Level I annual salary rate was $196,700 for the period January 1 through December 31, 2009.

EFFECTIVE January 1, 2010, the Executive Level I salary level increased to $199,700.
For more details on the implementation of the new salary limitation, please visit:
http://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/notice-files/NOT-OD-10-041.html

Posted 1/20/2010

New NIH Recovery Act Funding Opportunities

  Methodology Development in Comparative Effectiveness Research (RC4) – Opens January 26, 2010

This FOA invites applications to enhance, develop, or evaluate methodologies to improve the efficiency, validity, and credibility of comparative effectiveness research (CER) studies. CER encompasses a wide array of methodologies, including technology assessment, meta-analysis, systematic reviews, observational studies, and experimental trials. Each of these methodologies suffers from substantial weaknesses that limit their ability to rapidly provide information sought by patients, clinicians, and other stakeholders to make robust evidence-based decisions on clinical practice and public policy. Research is needed to develop better methods for measuring or reducing these weaknesses, which include, for example, confounding bias in observational studies and selection bias in randomized trials.

For More information and application instructions: http://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/rfa-files/RFA-OD-10-009.html
 
  NIH Directors Opportunity for Research in Five Thematic Areas (RC4) – Opens February 15, 2010

This FOA seeks proposals to develop and implement critical research innovation in one or more of the following:
  1. Applying Genomics and Other High Throughput Technologies
  2. Translating Basic Science Discoveries into New and Better Treatments
  3. Using Science to Enable Health Care Reform
  4. Focusing on Global Health
  5. Reinvigorating the Biomedical Research Community

The research supported by this program should have high short-term impact, and a high likelihood of enabling growth and investment in biomedical research and development, public health, and health care delivery. This program will support projects that will benefit from significant three-year funds without the expectation of continued NIH funding beyond this period.

For More information and application instructions: http://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/rfa-files/RFA-OD-10-005.html

Posted 1/20/2010

NIH Program Announcements for NCI and NHLBI – Opening in January

Research Project Grant (Parent R01) – NCI and NHLBI
Receipt/Submission Date(s): http://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/pa-files/PA-10-067.html
Academic Research Enhancement Award (Parent R15) – NCI and NHLBI
Receipt/Submission Date(s): http://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/pa-files/PA-10-070.html
Exploratory Developmental Research Grant Program (Parent R21) - NHLBI
Receipt/Submission Date(s): http://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/pa-files/PA-10-069.html
Independent Scientist Award (Parent K02) – NCI and NHLBI
Receipt/Submission Date(s): http://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/pa-files/PA-10-057.html
Academic Career Award (Parent K07) - NCI
Receipt/Submission Date(s): http://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/pa-files/PA-10-058.html
Mentored Clinical Scientist Research Career Development Award (Parent K08) – NCI and NHLBI
Receipt/Submission Date(s): Multiple dates, see announcement.
http://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/pa-files/PA-10-059.html
Mentored Patient-Oriented Research Career Development Award (Parent K23) – NCI and NHLBI
Receipt/Submission Date(s): http://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/pa-files/PA-10-060.html
Midcareer Investigator Award in Patient-Oriented Research (Parent K24) – NCI and NHLBI
Receipt/Submission Date(s): http://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/pa-files/PA-10-061.html
Mentored Quantitative Research Development Award (Parent K25) – NCI and NHLBI
Receipt/Submission Date(s): http://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/pa-files/PA-10-062.html
Pathway to Independence Award (Parent K99/R00) – NCI and NHLBI
Receipt/Submission Date(s): http://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/pa-files/PA-10-063.html

Posted 1/4/2010

NCI Funding Opportunity: Prediction Models for Cancer Risk and Prognosis (R01/R21)

At present, few funded studies focus on the development, application, and validation of risk prediction models for individuals at average or high risk of cancer or on models for estimating prognosis and/or response to treatment of patients with cancer.

This opportunity encourages applications from those working in the field of cancer control and prevention to improve existing models for cancer risk and prognosis. The program is designed to support research to develop new and refine existing cancer risk prediction, prognostic, and response to therapy models and to validate them in appropriate populations. In xparticular, it will provide a mechanism under which investigators can address two major challenges in model development, namely integrating diverse types of data and ensuring adequate validation. These models may:

  • identify individuals at high risk of developing a new cancer or a recurrence who may benefit from targeted screening, treatment, or other interventions.
  • aid in the design and planning of clinical cancer prevention, screening, and treatment trials.
  • enable the development of benefit-risk indices, estimation of the population burden and cost of cancer, and evaluate the impact of a specific intervention or treatment.
Opening Date: January 5, 2010 (Earliest date an application may be submitted)
Application Due Date(s): Standard dates apply
Expiration Date: January 8, 2013

R01: http://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/pa-files/PA-10-025.html
R21: http://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/pa-files/PA-10-026.html

Posted 11/30/2009

NHLBI New Funding Opportunity (R34) to Support Clinical Trial Pilot Studies

National Heart Lung and Blood Institute invites applications proposing pilot studies to obtain data that is critical for the design of robust clinical trials. This funding opportunity should be used to fill gaps in scientific knowledge necessary to develop a competitive full-scale clinical trial.

Appropriate pilot studies might demonstrate feasibility of an intervention or an experimental design, estimate intervention parameters, or gather other data important for the design of a trial. Grants that propose solely to write a protocol or manual of operations or to develop infrastructure for a clinical trial will not be considered appropriate for this announcement. Applications must demonstrate that the proposed pilot studies are both necessary and sufficient to permit the design of the clinical trial.

NHLBI anticipates that the R34 award period will yield more competitive investigator-initiated clinical trial grant applications and more robust and successful clinical trials that evaluate interventions for the treatment or prevention of heart, lung, blood, or sleep disorders.

The total project period for an application submitted in response to this funding opportunity may not exceed three years. Direct costs are limited to $450,000 over a three-year period, with no more than $225,000 in direct costs allowed in any single year.

Opening Date: January 16, 2010 (Earliest date applications may be submitted)
Letter of Intent Receipt Date(s): 30 days prior to standard application due dates.
Application Due Date(s): Standard dates apply, please see http://grants.nih.gov/grants/funding/submissionschedule.htm
More Information and Application Instructions: http://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/pa-files/PAR-10-005.html

Posted 10/14/2009

NIH: Shorter applications better aligned to the review criteria

Starting with applications due January 25, 2010, and beyond, applicants will have new forms and instructions to apply for all NIH grants. The R01 grant application and most others will be shorter and better aligned to the review criteria. Detailed information has been posted in the NIH Guide: http://grants1.nih.gov/grants/guide/notice-files/NOT-OD-09-149.html.

Posted 9/25/2009

FDA Pediatric Clinical Trials Workshop, October 29-30, 2009

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing a public workshop entitled "Pediatric Clinical Trials Workshop: Unmet Needs, Trial Designs and Clinically Meaningful Safety and Effectiveness Outcomes." The purpose of the public workshop is to solicit information from primary and secondary health care providers, academia, industry, and professional societies on various aspects of device clinical trials involving pediatric diseases and patients.

Information from this public workshop will help stimulate interest in pediatric device clinical trial research methods, and develop topics for further discussion regarding the safety of pediatric device clinical trials. The information gathered in this and future workshops will help to develop future guidance for developing safe clinical trials for devices intended for pediatric patients. We encourage participation and comments from workshop attendees on the topics and questions discussed.

Specialty Discussion topics include:
      •    Pediatric Musculoskeletal Disease
      Pediatric Cardiovascular Disease
      Pediatric Abdominal and GI diseases
      Pediatric Neurologic Disorders
      Pediatric Genitourinary Diseases
      Pediatric Speech and Audiologic Disorders and
      Diagnostics for pediatric patients: Challenges


Dates and Times: October 29, 2009, 8 a.m. to 5:30 p.m. and October 30, 2009, from 8 a.m. to 12 noon.
Location: Holiday Inn College Park located off I-95 at 10000 Baltimore Ave., College Park, MD 20740. The hotel front desk number is 1-301-345-6700.

Please see instructions for registration and for providing comments at http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/NewsEvents/WorkshopsConferences/ucm170938.htm.

Posted 9/18/2009

NHLBI Announces Structural Change

The National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute (NHLBI) announces that the Division of Cardiovascular Diseases (DVD) and the Division of Prevention and Population Sciences (DPPS) will merge to form the Division of Cardiovascular Sciences (DCVS) in order to align the Institute's administrative structure with its cardiovascular programs which now effectively span basic, clinical, and population research. The merger follows the resignation of Dr. Marvin Konstam as chief of the DVD at the NHLBI. Dr. Michael Lauer, currently the Director of the DPPS, will be serving as Director of the new Division, and Dr. Sonia Skarlatos, currently Acting Director of the Division of Cardiovascular Diseases, will be serving as Deputy Director. There was considerable overlap in the interests of both divisions in their long term strategic plans and this structural change positions the DCVS for central leadership and cross-branch interactions. Dr. Lauer is highly regarded by members of both prior divisions and by their respective branches and this is seen as a thoughtful move that strategically aligns the interests of both of the prior divisions. From the viewpoint of the cardiac surgical community, this reorganization has no important consequence as the branch chiefs within that component previously designated the DVD, all remain the same and the responsibilities for each remain the same. Readers who have a more detailed interest are referred to a recent article in the Journal of the American College of Cardiology entitled, “News from the NHLBI,” which was published in volume 54 of the 2009 edition on pages 265-268.

Posted 9/2/2009

NHLBI Funding Opportunity (R01)

NHLBISystems Biology Collaborations -- This Funding Opportunity encourages R01 applications from institutions/organizations that propose collaborative systems biology research projects by multi-disciplinary teams to advance the understanding of normal physiology and perturbations associated with heart, lung, blood, and sleep diseases and disorders. Multi-disciplinary expertise across experimental and computational domains is required and the multi-PI mechanism is allowed, as integration across these domains is a critical element of the proposed research plan. For a full description of this FOA please visit: http://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/pa-files/PAR-09-214.html

Posted 6/25/2009

Dr. David H. Harpole named co-chair of the NCI Lung Cancer Steering Committee.

Dr. David HarpoleDr. David H. Harpole, co-chair of the AATS Scientific Affairs and Government Relations (SAGR) Committee has been named co-chair of the National Cancer Institute (NCI) Lung Cancer Steering Committee. The recently developed NCI Committee oversees all Phase II and Phase III lung cancer trials in the US, develops State of the Science Development Meetings to prioritize strategies for NCI-supported clinical trials and sets up future NCI grant funding opportunities. Dr. Harpole is the first surgeon to hold this position.

Posted 5/20/2009

Dr. Marc Moon appointed to serve on the FDA's Circulatory System Devices Panel.

Dr. Marc MoonIn March 2009, AATS member Marc R. Moon, M.D., who is the Joseph C. Bancroft Professor of Surgery at Washington University in Saint Louis, was appointed to serve on the Circulatory System Devices Panel in the Center for Devices and Radiological Health of the Food and Drug Administration.  Dr. Moon will serve a 4-year term on the panel, which is responsible for the evaluation and approval of novel medical/surgical devices related to the circulatory system, including ventricular assist and intracardiac prostheses, percutaneous coronary and valvular repair or replacement instrumentation, and endovascular grafts. 

The evaluation process consists of detailed pre-meeting review of clinical study reports, safety and effectiveness data, and product labeling generated by the applicant in preparation for the panel.  Panel members then participate in open and closed discussions with industry representatives, culminating in a recommendation regarding whether or not sufficient information has been provided to support the approval or disapproval of the product. 

The Agency recruited Dr. Moon for his expertise in the application of novel medical devices to bring external knowledge and opinions to the evaluation process of products that may ultimately be available to cardiothoracic surgeons across the country.

Posted 4/08/2009

NHLBI / NCI Stimulus-Funded Grant Proposals Due April 27

The National Heart Lung and Blood Institute (NHLBI) and the National Cancer Institute (NCI) have posted information regarding its participation in the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (AARA) www.nhlbi.nih.gov/funding/index.htm and http://challenge.nci.nih.gov/
including details on the new Challenge Grants in health and science research.  Please note some of these Challenge Grants may be of particular interest to cardiothoracic surgeons. Descriptions and application information for the grants are available at http://grants.nih.gov/grants/funding/challenge_award/Omnibus.pdf.  The NHLBI and NCI Challenge Grants have an application deadline of April 27, 2009.  The NHLBI must obligate all of the stimulus funds received by September 2010.

Funds are available in these categories:
• Behavior, Behavioral Change and Prevention
• Bioethics,
• Biomarker Discovery and Validation
• Clinical Research
• Comparative Effectiveness Research
• Enabling Technologies
• Enhancing Clinical Trials
• Genomics
• Health Disparities
• Information Technology for Processing Health Care Data for Research
• Regenerative Medicine
• Stem Cells
• Translational Science

More details on the overall NIH’s role in the ARRA are available at www.nih.gov/about/director/02252009statement_arra.htm.

Posted 3/08/2009

NCI -- Allowable Salary Levels on Career Awards

The National Cancer Institute (NCI) has changed the allowable levels of salary support for early career and midcareer investigators.  Effective January 1, 2009, the salary cap is set at $100,000 per year with a 75% percent effort for K08 and $30,000 in research development support.  The remaining effort may be devoted to clinical, teaching, and/or other research pursuits and activities consistent with the objectives of the awarded grant.  For more information, see http://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/notice-files/NOT-CA-09-013.html.

Posted 3/08/2009

NIH Notice: Salary Limitation on Grants

The Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2008, Public Law 110-161, restricts the amount of direct salary of an individual under an NIH grant to Executive Level I of the Federal Executive Pay scale. The Executive Level I annual salary rate was $191,300 for the period January 1 through December 31, 2008.

EFFECTIVE January 1, 2009, the Executive Level I salary level increased to $196,700.

For more details on the implementation of the new salary limitation, please visit: http://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/notice-files/NOT-OD-09-037.html

Posted 3/05/2009

AHRQ Mentored Clinical Scientist Research Career Development Award (K08)

This Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) program prepares qualified individuals for careers that have a significant impact on the quality, safety, efficiency, and effectiveness of health care for all Americans.  This program provides support and “protected time” to individuals with a clinical doctoral degree for an intensive, supervised research career development experience in health services research.  The award can be used both by individuals who propose to newly embark in heath services research training and those who had a hiatus in their research careers because of illness or family circumstances.  The award is also available to promote research workforce diversity by providing enhanced research career development opportunities.  Candidates interested in pursuing careers in patient-oriented research are eligible to apply for this award at AHRQ.

Application Due: March 9, 2009. For more details on the AHRQ Mentored Clinical Scientist Research Career Development Award, please visit: http://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/pa-files/PAR-09-085.html

Posted 2/09/2009

K23 Mentored Patient-Oriented Research Career Development Award

This K23 award is to support the career development of investigators who have made a commitment to focus their research endeavors on patient-oriented research.  Prospective candidates are encouraged to contact the relevant Institute or Center (IC) staff for IC-specific programmatic and budgetary information: Table of Institute and Center Contacts.

For more information on this award visit:
http://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/pa-files/PA-09-043.html

Posted 1/15/2009


K08 Mentored Clinical Scientist Research Career Development Award

This K08 program is to prepare qualified individuals for careers that have a significant impact on the health-related research needs of the Nation.  This program represents the continuation of a long-standing NIH program that provides support and “protected time” to individuals with a clinical doctoral degree for an intensive, supervised research career development experience in the fields of biomedical and behavioral research, including translational research. Prospective candidates are encouraged to contact the relevant Institute or Center (IC) staff for IC-specific programmatic and budgetary information: Table of Institute and Center Contacts.

For more information on this award visit:
http://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/pa-files/PA-09-042.html

Posted 1/15/2009

New NIH Registration Process to Reimburse Reviewers

A new simplified registration process is in place to facilitate disbursement of honoraria and expenses to reviewers for their valued participation in peer review meetings. The new system replaces the U.S. Central Contractor Registration (CCR) system that NIH used previously for this purpose.

Reviewers are urged to start registering in the new system beginning January 17, 2009.

The new system will require reviewers to log-in to the RA Commons https://commons.era.nih.gov/commons/ with their user name and password and update their Personal Profile, and then link to a secure payment system.

Registration:
Please follow these step-by-step instructions: 
http://grants.nih.gov/grants/peer/reviewer_instructions_payment.doc

The new system has many advantages over the CCR system:

  • The secure payment site is controlled by the NIH Office of Financial Management and information entered as part of the new registration process will be kept secure and confidential.
  • Only you can access your information with your eRA Commons log-in.
  • Reviewers will not be spammed by third party solicitations.
  • The registration process is greatly simplified.
  • Annual renewal of the registration is not required. However, NIH will rely on reviewers to maintain and update their financial institution, residential address and other information. This is particularly important if a reviewer shifts residence or moves to another bank.
  • NIH is committed to ensuring that all reviewers receive their disbursements as efficiently as possible and would like to thank you for your continued support of the NIH peer review process during this transition.

For more details go to:
http://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/notice-files/NOT-OD-09-033.html

Posted 1/15/2009

CSR Announces Updated Study Sections

The Center for Scientific Review (CSR) has updated and enhanced its study section descriptions. The three most relevant to Cardiothoracic Surgeons are as follows:

Bioengineering, Technology, and Surgical Sciences [BTSS]
Reviews grant applications in the interdisciplinary fields of surgery and bioengineering. Within BTSS there is a balance between basic, translational, and clinical research and application and development of emerging cross-cutting technologies relevant to the cardiac system.
 
Surgery, Anesthesiology, and Trauma Study Section [SAT]
Reviews applications in the disciplines of surgery, anesthesiology, and critical care.  Sepsis and injury studies reviewed by SAT often address the host response to these complex insults such as trauma, disseminated infection, or surgical stress, with a general focus on systemic metabolic, hormonal, or immune responses to infection and multi-organ damage.
 
Myocardial Ischemia and Metabolism [MIM]
Reviews applications involving basic and applied aspects of myocardial ischemia/reperfusion, coronary circulation, and myocardial metabolism. It includes the review of studies using molecular, genetic, cellular, biochemical, pharmacological, genomic, proteomic, and physiological approaches to define normal and pathological processes. MIM examines investigations at all levels of organization, ranging from in vitro models of simulated ischemia in isolated cells to whole animal models.

For a full listing and description of study section updates, please visit the CSR Website at: http://cms.csr.nih.gov/PeerReviewMeetings/CSRIRGDescriptionNew/

Posted 1/12/2009

NIH Peer Review System Updates for FY 2010 Funding

In June 2007, the NIH initiated a formal, agency-wide effort to review the NIH peer review system.  After careful deliberation and consideration of the recommendations resulting from this year-long effort, a number of key actions will be implemented including:

Posted 1/12/2009

Dr. Andrew S. Wechsler appointed as Senior Advisor to the Division of Cardiovascular Diseases of the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute

On November 1, 2008, Dr. Andrew S. Wechsler was appointed as Senior Advisor to the Division of Cardiovascular Diseases (DCVD) of the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI). The DCVD has 5 divisions:

Much of the function of the DCVD relates to administration of the extramural grant program. A very significant amount of its resources are directed at the initiation of new programs that are perceived to forward its mission in each of the above areas. Trials of new therapies, gathering of critical thought leaders, initiation of RFP's in focused areas, novel training approaches, translational research and advanced devices are all part of the "discretionary" component of its efforts. The special needs of cardiothoracic surgeon have come to the foreground through these evolving therapeutic technologies. Within the appropriate confines of confidentiality we anticipate frequent reports that outline novel opportunities for CT surgeons.

Posted 11/18/2008

NHLBI Seeks Leader for the Division of Cardiovascular Diseases (DCVD)

This position is an extraordinary opportunity for a physician/scientist ready to make a career move into a role with immense potential and ensure that the public investment in the future of medical research and education will be well used, serving both the profession and society. The Director of DCVD assumes a policy-making role, shaping the future of cardiovascular research in this country and leading internationally-renowned programs that integrate basic science and clinical research. The Director of DCVD will have vision, creativity, and the ability to recruit talented individuals and build teams.

Applications are due by December 1, 2008. You can view the position ad at http://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/about/jobs/index.htm#DCVD. If you have a personal interest in this position or would like to suggest a top quality candidate, please respond to NHLBIIOD@mail.nih.gov.

Posted 11/07/2008

A2 applications to be eliminated

Beginning with original new applications (i.e., never submitted) and competing renewal applications submitted for the January 25, 2009 due dates and beyond, the NIH will accept only a single amendment to the original application.
Read the complete text...

Posted 10/16/2008

Encouraging Early Transition to Research Independence: Modifying the NIH New Investigator Policy to Identify Early Stage Investigators (NOT-OD-08-121)

National Institutes of Health

This notice describes a change in NIH New Investigator policies designed to encourage early transition to independence. Under this policy, New Investigators within ten years of completing their terminal research degree or within ten years of completing their medical residency will be designated Early Stage Investigators (ESIs). Traditional NIH research grant (R01s) applications from ESIs will be identified and the career stage of the applicant will be considered at the time of review and award.
Read the complete text...

Posted 10/16/2008

Elias A. Zerhouni to End Tenure as Director of the National Institutes of Health
National Institutes of Health (NIH)

Bethesda, Md, September 24, 2008 — Elias A. Zerhouni, M.D., the director of the National Institutes of Health, today announced his plans to step down at the end of October 2008 to pursue writing projects and explore other professional opportunities.
Read complete text...

Posted 9/26/2008

Stats reveal bias in NIH grant review

Heidi Ledford

The system used by the US National Institutes of Health (NIH) to evaluate grant proposals does not adequately compensate for reviewer bias, a new study concludes.

The assessment of grant reviews generated by more than 14,000 reviewers suggests that the NIH needs to overhaul the peer-review system it uses to rank proposals, according to biostatistician Valen Johnson of the University of Texas M.
Read the complete text...
(Note: to read this story in full you will need to login to Nature.com or make a payment)

Posted 9/26/2008

Enhancing NIH Peer Review Activity Implementation Timeline

September 17, 2008 MEMO TO: NIH Grantee Community

FROM: Director, NIH

SUBJECT: Enhancing NIH Peer Review Activity Implementation Timeline

The NIH Peer Review Oversight Committee and three subgroups consisting of NIH program, review, grants management and evaluation staff have developed an initial implementation timeline for the Enhancing Peer Review activity. The recommendations that are being implemented are based on the result of the diagnostic phase and significant dialogue with both the internal and external communities regarding enhancements to the review system (please see http://enhancing-peer-review.nih.gov for an overview of the Enhancing Peer Review effort). I view these enhancements as progress towards ensuring the continuation of NIH’s world renowned peer review system.

Although the subgroups are continuing to work out specific details of the implementation plans, I want to share with you the first of the preliminary implementation plans for the 2009 through 2010 calendar years as follows:

Priority Area 1 – Engage the Best Reviewers

  • Improve Reviewer Retention: In 2009, new reviewers will be given additional flexibility regarding their tour of duty, and other efforts will be undertaken to improve retention of standing review members.
  • Recruit the Best Reviewers: A toolkit, incorporating best practices for recruiting reviewers, will be made available to all ICs in 2009.
  • Enhance Reviewer Training: In spring 2009, training will be available to reviewers and SROs related to the changes in peer review.
  • Allow Flexibility through Virtual Reviews: Pilots will be conducted in 2009 on the feasibility of using high-bandwidth support for review meetings to provide reviewers greater flexibility and alternatives for in-person meetings.
Priority Area 2 – Improve the Quality and Transparency of Review
  • Improve Scoring Transparency and Scale: Review criteria-based scoring on 1 to 7 scale commences in May 2009. Reviewers will provide feedback through scores and critiques for each criterion in a structured summary statement.
  • Provide Scores for Streamlined Applications: In 2009, streamlined applications will receive a preliminary score.
  • Shorten and Restructure Applications: Shorter (12-page research plan) R01 applications (with other activity codes scaled appropriately) will be restructured to align with review criteria for January 2010 receipt dates.
Priority Area 3 – Ensure Balanced and Fair Reviews across Scientific Fields and Career Stages, and Reduce Administrative Burden
  • Fund the Best Science Earlier and Reduce Need for Resubmissions: To ensure that the largest number of high quality and meritorious applications receive funding earlier and to improve system efficiency, NIH is considering separate percentiling of new and resubmitted applications and permitting one amended application.
  • Review Like Applications Together: NIH is establishing an Early Stage Investigator (ESI) designation. In 2009, NIH will evaluate clustering ESI applications for review. The same approach will be considered for clinical research applications.
Thank You
The enhancing peer review activity has been an intensive year-long effort. Many of you have contributed valuable feedback and input and I’d like to take this opportunity to convey my appreciation and specially thank you for your input.

Updates and details will be posted at http://enhancing-peer-review.nih.gov and published in the monthly Extramural Nexus (subscribe at https://list.nih.gov/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=extramuralnexus&A=1) as they are known. Also, several notices will be posted in the NIH Guide detailing specific elements of this implementation.

Elias A. Zerhouni, M.D.

Posted 9/17/2008

NIH Extramural Loan Repayment Programs

The NIH announces a Loan Repayment Program for qualified health professionals who contractually agree to engage in NIH mission-relevant research for at least two years, and who agree to engage in such research for at least 50 percent of their work schedule (not less than 20 hours per week based on a 40-hour work week). Each of the five extramural Loan Repayment Programs provide for the repayment of educational loan debt of up to $35,000 annually for qualified health professionals performing research within the mission of NIH at domestic, non-profit, or government entities. The five extramural Loan Repayment Programs have specific eligibility requirements and funding set-asides.

Loan Repayment Programs applications will be accepted annually from September 1 through December 1, 8:00 p.m. EST. Applications must be submitted electronically using the NIH Loan Repayment Program Website, www.lrp.nih.gov.

Posted 8/14/2008

Stem Cells and Cancer (R21) Funding Opportunity

The National Cancer Institute (NCI), and the National Institute on Aging (NIA) have issued a funding opportunity announcement to encourage research in all aspects of tumor stem cell biology, including the molecular and biochemical regulation of embryonic and adult stem cell behavior relevant to tumor formation. This opportunity intends to stimulate efforts on isolation and characterization of tumor stem cells from a large spectrum of tumors. Individuals with the skills, knowledge, and resources necessary to carry out the proposed research are invited to work with their institution/organization to develop an application for support. The total project period for an application submitted in response to this funding opportunity may not exceed 2 years. Direct costs are limited to $275,000 over an R21 2-year period, with no more than $200,000 in direct costs allowed in any single year. More information on this program can be found at http://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/pa-files/PA-08-165.html.

Posted 6/23/2008

NIH-Supported Midcareer Development Award Program.

The NIH announces a Midcareer Investigator Award in Patient-Oriented Research. Under this program, mid-career health-professional doctorates or equivalent who are typically at the Associate Professor level or the equivalent will receive support for protected time to devote to Patient-Oriented Research and to act as research mentors primarily for clinical residents, clinical fellows and/or junior clinical faculty. Candidates must commit 3-6 person months (equivalent to 25 to 50% effort) to conducting patient-oriented research and mentoring. Applicants may request three to five years of support (at least three years are required). For more information please visit: http://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/pa-files/PA-08-151.html.

Posted 6/23/2008

NHLBI (R01) Request for Applications: Developmental Origins of Altered Lung Physiology and Immune Function

The purpose of this NHLBI R01 is to solicit applications that propose to perform research that will enhance the understanding of how the pre- and postnatal environments affect the interplay of the lung and immune system during development resulting in sustained changes in lung physiology and immune function that compromise respiratory health and outcomes. More information can be found at http://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/rfa-files/RFA-HL-08-009.html.

Posted 6/04/2008

Revision of NIH Policy Concerning Concurrent Support from Mentored Career Development (K) Award and a Research Grant

NIH mentored K awards are intended to support a period of mentored career development in preparation for a role as an independent researcher in biomedical and behavioral science. NIH allows K awards recipients to hold concurrent support from their K award and a competing research grant when recognized as a Principal Investigator (PI) or subproject Director of a multi-project NIH grant. Currently mentored K award recipients in the last two years of their support period are permitted to reduce the level of effort required for the K award and replace that effort with effort on an NIH research grant or subproject provided they remain in a mentored situation. The new policy change detailed at http://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/notice-files/NOT-OD-08-065.html expands eligible grants to include research grants obtained from any Federal agency; clarifies when the research grant may be obtained relative to the years remaining on the K award; and clarifies that status as a PI on a multiple PI award also confers eligibility.

Posted 4/23/2008

NHLBI Does Not Accept R21 Applications Primarily Related to Cancer Research

The purpose of this Notice is to advise investigators who plan to submit applications under the parent FOA (PA-06-181) for the NIH Exploratory/Developmental Research Grant (R21) award mechanism that the NHLBI does not accept the assignment of applications which focus primarily on cancer. Since there are some areas of overlapping interest, e.g., basic aspects of hematological malignancies resulting from disruptions in hematopoiesis, myeloproliferative and myelodysplastic disorders, or the use of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation and other cellular therapies, applicants are strongly encouraged to contact the NHLBI before submitting an application in response to this FOA.

For More Information: http://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/notice-files/NOT-HL-08-113.html

Posted 3/12/2008

NIH Gives Reviewers New Flexibility Submitting Applications

Green Light for Continuous Submission: NIH has just increased the incentives for scientists to serve as chartered or permanent members on its peer review groups so it can improve reviewer recruitment to better identify the most promising research for funding. These researchers, who typically serve four years reviewing NIH grant applications, now have more flexibility in submitting their own grant applications.

A recent NIH Guide Notice explains a new policy that gives these reviewers the option to submit—as soon as they are developed—R01, R21 or R34 applications that would normally be submitted for standard submission dates. Chartered members are strongly encouraged to add a cover letter to their applications requesting this option. This new policy was developed to help chartered reviewers, who can be disadvantaged by deadlines that force them to develop their own applications while reviewing those submitted to NIH by others. These reviewers may still request a review by a standing study section other than their own. In this case, they must submit their applications in accord with established deadlines. The current windows for reviewers to submit many of these applications late will remain available. These windows will also remain available for temporary reviewers and those serving on Special Emphasis Panels.

Continuous submission will be carefully evaluated to see whether eligibility should be extended. View the NIH Guide Notice at http://grants1.nih.gov/grants/guide/notice-files/NOT-OD-08-026.html.

Posted 2/7/2008

NIH Notice: Salary Limitation on Grants

Every year since 1990 Congress has legislatively mandated a provision limiting the direct salary that an individual may receive under an NIH grant. For FY 2008, Public Law 110-161: Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2008 restricts the amount of direct salary to Executive Level I of the Federal Executive Pay scale. The Executive Level I annual salary rate was $186,600 for the period January 1 through December 31, 2007.

EFFECTIVE January 1, 2008, the Executive Level I salary level increased to $191,300.

For more details on the implementation of the new salary limitation, please visit: http://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/notice-files/NOT-OD-08-035.html

Posted 2/5/2008

AATS Progress in Achieving Goals for Peer Review of Cardiothoracic Surgical Grant Proposals to NIH
By Dr. Andrew S. Wechsler

For some years there has been growing concern for the peer review process put into place by the NIH about five years ago. The current method disperses grants by a system designation, irrespective of origin. Many grants previously reviewed by specially constituted study sections with strong surgical representation are now being reviewed by study sections, oftentimes unpopulated by any surgeons. Moreover, grants submitted by surgeons are no longer clustered in study sections particularly knowledgeable in the nuances of surgical investigation, appreciative of the translational nature of many grant applications and frequently are composed of members with a strong bias towards more fundamental investigation.

This trend was documented recently by Drs. Mann, Tendulkar, Birger, Howard and Ratcliffe in an article available in e-print and scheduled to appear in the December or January issue of the “Annals of Surgery”. During the interval from 1982 to 2004 the number of applications from surgical scientists failed to keep up proportionately with applications from other scientists by about 50%. Moreover, the success rate of grants from surgical scientists was importantly lower than the success rate for total NIH awards. Ratcliffe and his coauthors indicated that only about 2% of all NIH awards are to surgeon scientists.

The AATS Scientific Affairs and Government Relations committee has worked diligently to reverse the current method of grant assignment, initially by appealing to the CSR but more recently through direct contact with the director of NIH and the director of the NHLBI.  On August 29,2007 the AATS represented by Drs. Pedro DelNido, Irving Kron and Andrew Wechsler had the opportunity to meet with NIH Director Zerhouni, Dr. Scarpa the Director of the CSR, and the Directors of the Surgical Sciences, Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering Integrated Review Group and Cardiovascular Sciences Integrated Review Group. The meeting was facilitated by Mr. John Porter and Ms. Beth Halpern of Hogan and Hartson who have been working with the AATS to help the organization gain greater access to the key decision makers.

The meeting was cordial and frank. The position of the AATS was received quite sympathetically and there appeared to be accord that more surgical representation in study groups assessing surgical grants was needed as well as an effort to promote clustering of those grants. Several key issues emerged that will be addressed by AATS leadership which include:

  1. A need for more, high quality surgical reviewers to participate in the grant review process. The AATS has committed to providing names of those willing to serve to NIH and NIH is considering ways to facilitate the review process for clinically busy surgeons. Moreover, for those who serve as reviewers, the NIH has approved a policy of allowing continuous submission for their own grants, rather than using the usual deadlines associated with grant cycles.

  2. A general willingness to “cluster surgical grants” with some burden of responsibility on the person submitting to identify the study section they deem most appropriate to review the work being indicated in a letter at the time of submission.

  3. A desire to evaluate “peer reviewed” grants that have reviews thought to be of poor quality or which demonstrate a lack of understanding of the importance of the proposed work in the surgical clinical or investigative domain.

Posted 1/7/2008

We Model Excellence
Copyright © American Association for Thoracic Surgery. All rights reserved.
Read the Privacy Policy.
IMPORTANT REMINDER: The preceding information is intended only to provide
general guidance and not as a definitive basis for diagnosis or treatment in any particular case.
It is very important that you consult a doctor about any specific medical problem or question.